Paste the job description
You stop guessing what the filter wants.
30+ AI Agents. Zero AI Smell.
Your resume faces two gatekeepers that hate each other.
ATS systems demand robotic keyword stuffing. Human recruiters trash anything that smells like ChatGPT. Beat them both with 30+ agents that optimize for the machine but write for the human — using only your real experience. No fabrication. No AI smell.
- No credit card
- 15 free credits
- No AI smell
Try it free — paste a job descriptionInstant preview
No processing of your data — it's an instant preview.
What you'll see in the preview
- Keyword match — the gaps the ATS would flag
- AI-risk score — how likely it reads as AI-written
- The bullets that would get you filtered
No sign-up. No data stored. Just paste and see.
Proof you can read — not a marketing claim
- ~89%
- human-likeness — our built-in scorer rates it “very likely human”
- < 35
- AI-risk (of 100) — how likely it reads as AI-written
- 87%
- average ATS keyword match against the target job description
- 2
- resume versions — Faithful + Optimized, you choose which to send
- 10
- LinkedIn sections — built from the same data, zero contradictions
Every number above shows up in your dashboard, per resume — measured, not asserted.
The trilemma
Every other tool optimizes for one gatekeeper. You have two — and they hate each other.
- 1ATS systems auto-reject resumes that miss the keywords — before a human ever reads them.
- 2Hiring managers now trash anything that “smells like AI” the second they spot it.
- 3Doing both — without lying — is the whole game. ATS tools make you more machine-shaped, which makes the second gate worse.
~49%of hiring managers say they’d dismiss a resume that reads as AI-written. AgenticCV is built for exactly that gate.
The ATS robot
Wants 50+ exact keywords or it auto-rejects you.
The human
Deletes anything that reads like AI on sight.
No lying
Only the skills and experience you actually have.
AgenticCVresolves all three — and proves it with a score
The old way vs the AgenticCV way
One generalist guessing vs. a team that checks each other.
ChatGPT writes you an AI resume and hopes nobody notices. We run 30+ specialists — and a scorer whose only job is to catch the AI tells before a recruiter does.
The job
The old way
The AgenticCV way
Tailoring
ChatGPT one-shot, generic prompt
30+ agents analyze the JD & map your real experience
Voice
Generic “every applicant” tone
Reads like YOU on your best day
Keywords
Keyword-stuff & pray
Evidence-based placement — only skills you have
The AI tell
Hope they can’t tell it’s AI
A human-likeness score proves it (The Turing Police)
Versions
One version, fingers crossed
Faithful + Optimized — you choose which to send
Resume ≠ LinkedIn, contradictions everywhere
Both from one dataset — zero contradictions
How it works
Four steps from job posting to a resume that beats both gates.
Pick your resume
Built from what you’ve done, not a template.
30+ agents tailor & score it
Passes the bots AND the human who hates AI resumes.
Review scores & download
Walk in confident. Verdict: human.
The agents ask what they don’t know.
Instead of guessing, AgenticCV surfaces the specific gaps in your experience — so your resume reflects what you actually did, not a hallucinated version of it.
Watch the agents work
A packet of your experience travels the line — and comes out scored.
Your experience travels the line — analyzed, tailored, humanized, then scored. Watch the AI-risk gauge fall from 72 to 28 as it goes.
AI-risk score · watch it drop
high risksafe < 35
72→72~89% human
One bullet, de-roboticized
✗ Before (reads as AI)“Leveraged cutting-edge solutions to drive synergies and deliver impactful results across the org.”
✓ After (reads as you)Cut checkout latency 40% by re-architecting the payments queue — 2.1M orders/mo, zero downtime.
Hover or focus the pipeline to pause it. This is an illustration of a real run — every resume ships with its own scores.
Two resumes, one truth
A Faithful version and an Optimized version. You choose which to send.
Both are true. One is careful, one is confident.
Same facts. Both built only from your real experience. They differ in how hard they chase the keyword match — never in honesty.
Faithful80%+ keywords
- Every fact verifiable — adheres to your source resume
- Honest about real gaps instead of papering over them
- 80%+ keyword coverage, evidence-based
For roles where you want zero risk of an over-reach.
Optimized90%+ keywords
- Sharper wording, refined for maximum match
- 90%+ coverage — maximally competitive
- Same facts, better framing — still yours
For high-volume applications where match rate matters most.
We optimize wording, never your facts. Only skills you actually have.
The wedge
Everyone optimizes for the ATS robot. We also get you past the human — and prove it with a score.
No competitor measures “does this read as human?” The humanization pass strips the patterns that make writing read as AI — the tells that give AI writing away are removed — then The Turing Police, our independent human-likeness scorer, grades the result. You see the number before you submit.
We never say “undetectable.” It reads as authentically human because it’s built from your real experience — not generated from a template.
Human-likeness89%very likely human
AI-risk score28/ 100
AI-pattern tellsRemoved
Writing varietyMixed — human cadence
Don’t take our word for it
Don’t take our word for it. Take the score’s.
Here’s a real before → after, beside the score it ships with. No invented people, no fake logos — just numbers, and exactly how we built them.
Your original bullet
“Responsible for managing the backend and helping improve performance of the main API service.”
After the agents — same facts
“Owned the payments API; cut p99 latency 40% by re-architecting the caching layer, holding it under 120ms through a 3× traffic spike.”
The score it shipped with
Keyword match91%
AI-risk28
Human-likeness90%
Every resume ships with a score you can check. This is an illustrative sample output.
Why our own scorer — not a public detector?
Public AI-detectors disagree with each other and shift week to week — we’ve tested them. Ours is calibrated, consistent, and fully transparent: you see exactly how every score is built, per resume. No black-box verdict — you see the work.
This is what ships.
A clean, ATS-ready PDF — formatted, keyword-matched, and scored before you ever download it.
Resume + LinkedIn, aligned
One dataset. A resume and a 10-section LinkedIn profile — zero contradictions.
Teal does resumes. Careerflow does LinkedIn. Nobody does both coherently from one source. Your LinkedIn is built from the same facts as your Optimized resume — so a recruiter cross-checking the two never finds a mismatch.
Positioning SnapshotHeadlineAboutExperienceCareer BreaksSkillsFeaturedKeywordsOpen-To BlurbRecommendations
After you hit send
Track every application — from Applied to Offer
Each tailored resume is tied to the job it was built for, so you always know which version went where, and where it stands.
Applied
Series-B fintech
Sr. Backend · Optimized · 91% kw
Observability scale-up
Platform Eng · Faithful · 84% kw
Screening
Dev-tools startup
Infra · Optimized · 90% kw
Interview
PM-software co.
Backend · Optimized · 93% kw
Offer
Productivity SaaS
✓ Sr. Eng · verdict: human (90%)
Illustrative board — your real applications populate this as you go.
The crew
Not one big LLM guessing. A team of specialists, each with one job.
A system of 30+ specialized agents — each doing one job, then handing off, with an independent verdict at the end.
Analysis
Reads the posting like a recruiter and figures out what the role actually rewards.
Tailoring
Maps your real experience to what they’re asking — using only what you’ve actually done. No fabrication.
Humanization
Strips the patterns that make writing read as AI, until it sounds like you.
The Turing Police
The independent human-likeness verdict — the one that signs off before a recruiter can. Shows you the number before you submit.
30+ specialist agents in total. Density isn’t the pitch — the outcome is. This is what beats “ChatGPT + a template.”
Who’s it for
Built for anyone who applies — and refuses to sound like a robot.
Engineers, product managers, designers, marketers, ops, finance, new grads, career-switchers — if you tailor resumes for real postings and dread sending something that reads like ChatGPT wrote it, this is for you. Same agents, your field, your voice.
EngineeringProductDesignMarketingOperationsFinanceData & MLSalesNew gradsCareer-switchers
Pricing
One interview pays for a lifetime.
A wrong-fit resume costs you the interview. Starter is $19/mo. Credits never expire — they’re priced in applications, not abstract units.
Free
$0
≈1 complete application
- 15 credits
- Faithful + Optimized versions
- Full quality scores visible
- No credit card required
- Credits never expire
- Cancel anytime
- We never train on your resume
Questions